Recent News and Events
 The
Farm Services biosecurity plan for non-supply-managed industries, contained in
the following document, was requested by the Ontario Agricultural Commodity
Council Red Meat R&D Subcommittee. eBiz Professionals Inc. was asked to
provide a proposal to develop the plan, in recognition of the work which has
previously been completed in the Poultry industries in Ontario. That proposal
was accepted, and this report, and the Plan contained within it, are the result
of that assignment
A strategy to address the biosecurity practices of Ontario
livestock farm service providers is urgently needed. This group has been
identified as a gap in the industries’ barriers to disease transmission in
disease simulations operated by the Ontario Livestock and Poultry Council, and
in this study.
The Purpose of the project was to develop a plan for the
establishment of biosecurity protocols for the Farm Services which serve the
following eight livestock industries:
| Goat |
Veal |
| Beef |
Pork |
| Sheep |
Non-Dairy |
| Deer & Elk |
Ratites |
From the investigation undertaken by the project team, twenty-four farm
services were identified as active among these livestock industries:
| Barn Cleaners |
Bedding Suppliers |
| Board Inspectors |
Breeders |
| Catching Crews |
Commodity Buyers |
| Dead Stock and Rendering |
Drivers |
| Equipment Sales/Service |
Feed Suppliers |
| Fuel Suppliers – Home |
Fuel Suppliers – Barn |
| Hoof Trimmers |
Live Haul Truckers |
| Manure Managers |
Milk Inspectors |
| Municipal Employees |
Private Purchasers |
| Processor Sales/Service |
Provincial/Federal Employees |
| Veterinarians/Vet Service |
Visitors/Neighbours/Friends |
| Hatcheries |
Off-premise activities (Shows, Fairs, etc.) |
In several cases, it was determined that individual Farm
Services could be combined into groups with similar biosecurity requirements
across livestock sectors, and that similarly, several livestock industries
could be combined. These opportunities provide reductions in time and costs for
the development of a biosecurity program.
The work undertaken successfully for the Poultry industries in
Ontario provided both a methodology for the Plan and templates for SOPs. These
poultry protocols and related information are available for review on
www.agbiosecurity.ca. The project team and participants in that project
completed biosecurity protocols which could be used and adapted for use in the
subject livestock industries, and their farm services providers.
In order to demonstrate the applicability of the methodology
and templates developed in that earlier program, four new SOPs have been
developed during the design of the Plan, as a proof-of-concept. These SOPs were
generated with the help of industry working groups and review teams, as is
proposed for the go-forward Plan, and are presented in these documents.
The Plan has six steps, which are proposed to be carried out
over three years
1. Awareness and Buy-in
-
Communication of the content of this document and the information behind it, in
industry forums, meetings and privately-arranged sessions, with representatives
of the Farm Services and the Industries which it addresses
2. Infrastructure and Funding
-
Preparation of a funding proposal(s) for the execution of the Plan and the
establishment of the infrastructure required to manage it, including the
activities of a program Steering Committee
-
Establishment of an incorporated, not-for-profit association of Farm Services
to focus, manage and maintain the biosecurity program(s),and related
activities, preferably operating within an existing organization, such as OLPC
3. Preparation of Farm Services Biosecurity SOPs
-
Establishment of Working Groups of farm services practitioners to adapt and/or
develop biosecurity protocols for their services for all subject livestock
industries
-
Integration of Farm Services SOPs with OFFSAP and other farm-level programs
4. Implementation
-
Documentation and testing of training programs and materials for each service,
working in each industry
-
Pilots and trials in each segment to demonstrate and prove the program elements
-
“Classroom” training and on-line information availability for all services in
all industries
5. Certification and Information Management
-
Establish a certification process and a third-party auditing program to ensure
ongoing adherence to the biosecurity program(s)
-
Design and implement an independent data management facility to maintain
participation and certification information for participants and their
supply-chain partners
6. Program Maintenance
-
Establish a procedure, managed and executed by the Farm Services Association,
for the ongoing maintenance and improvement of the biosecurity program(s)
Program timing is illustrated in the following figure:
The sequence and duration of each activity in the Plan has been recommended in
the detailed description in the following document, based on the project team’s
analysis of current readiness, priority for action, and the application of
three types of SOP development.
The costs associated with the establishment and implementation of the Farm
Services Biosecurity program are estimated to total approximately $3.0 million
for the full three-year plan, as detailed in the following table:
|
Program
Steps
|
Program
Elements
|
Year
1
|
Year
2
|
Year
3
|
Total
|
|
1.
Awareness and Buy-In
|
|
$25,000
|
$15,000
|
$15,000
|
$55,000
|
|
2.
Infrastructure and Funding
|
Funding
Proposal
|
$15,000
|
|
|
$15,000
|
|
Association
|
$139,000
|
$204,000
|
$204,000
|
$547,000
|
|
3.
Preparation of Protocols
|
Coordination
with On-Farm
|
$48,000
|
$36,000
|
$36,000
|
$120,000
|
|
Protocol
Development
|
$90,250
|
$226,750
|
$232,000
|
$549,000
|
|
4.
Implementation
|
Documentation
and Testing
|
$12,500
|
$50,000
|
$50,000
|
$112,500
|
|
Pilots
and Trials
|
|
$50,000
|
$50,000
|
$100,000
|
|
Training
and Information
|
$50,000
|
$100,000
|
$100,000
|
$250,000
|
|
5.
Certification and Information Management
|
Certification
and Audit Program
|
|
$450,000
|
$650,000
|
$1,100,000
|
|
Data
Management Facility
|
|
$25,000
|
$50,000
|
$75,000
|
|
6.
Program Maintenance
|
|
|
$25,000
|
$50,000
|
$75,000
|
|
Totals
|
|
$379,750
|
$1,181,750
|
$1,437,000
|
$2,998,500
|
Program risks are anticipated to be limited in number, but significant:
1. Committed funding for all aspects of the Plan will be needed at the outset.
Individual funding programs which are currently in place at both the Federal
and Provincial levels, do not appear to provide for all of the elements of the
Plan.
Many Farm Services organizations work at the fringes of the industry, and are
neither organized, nor sufficiently profitable to support the costs of
development and implementation of their programs. Producers, and producer
groups, while they are partners with the services industry, are not prepared to
absorb these costs. Therefore, government funding for all or a large part of
the costs of development and implementation, will be required.
One of the first requirements of the Plan is to prepare a comprehensive funding
proposal, using this document and the information contained within it as
structure and rationale. To address the funding risk, the preparation of such a
proposal will need to be taken on with the involvement and support of the
industries and services affected. The proposal will incorporate the
establishment of a self-sustaining model for the longer term, as the logical
outgrowth of the request for funding for these important transitional
activities.
2. Participation in the programs by Farm Services organizations is a key factor
for success. While earlier experience indicates that a few participants can be
expected to adopt their biosecurity program(s) voluntarily, the vast majority
will need to be encouraged by one of two factors:
2.1. The demand, by the producers whom they serve, for their participation in a
biosecurity program which they, or their industry association, recognize as
sufficient for their on-farm needs. The possibility of insurance against
disease losses would also provide this impetus; or
2.2. The establishment of a legislated requirement for their
participation. Fortunately, there have been successful implementations of
programs of a similar nature in the Canadian poultry and livestock industries –
the implementation of OFFSAP programs in poultry, for example – which can
provide guidance and best practices for this program. Internationally,
especially in Europe, successful models have also been developed.
3. Experienced resources will be needed to provide for the speed of execution
required by the sponsors of the Plan. In all, ninety-five individual
service/commodity SOPs will need to be developed; and pilot, testing and
training programs designed for their implementation. Certification programs
need to be designed and published.
The expertise and experience which the project team members and additional eBiz
associates have amassed during this and previous assignments, can be made
available among suitable other organizations – such as training organizations
with experience in agriculture programs, and certification organizations with
existing on-farm programs. By structuring an implementation network under
experienced leadership and management, both knowledge and resources can be
leveraged to provide for the size and complexity of the Plan.
Deliverables for this assignment include the outline of a Communications program
to be employed in step one of the Plan. In fact, it will be instituted
following acceptance of this report; its first goal will be to inform
government and industry stakeholders about the details and dimensions of the
Plan. The Plan contained in this document will be reviewed with the Ontario
Livestock and Poultry Council (OLPC), interested commodity groups, and the
Canadian Animal Health Coalition, in combined and individual industry meetings.
The new Office of Animal Biosecurity at the CFIA will also be connected to the
activity as will OMAFRA.
The project team is pleased to have been asked to prepare this Plan, and look
forward to the opportunity to review its contents with representatives of the
Livestock and Farm Services industry.
Ian Richardson, President
eBiz Professionals Inc.
Download
the complete report as a pdf
|